Abstract
We explore the benefits of forecast combinations based on forecast-encompassing tests compared to simple averages and to Bates–Granger combinations. We also consider a new combination algorithm that fuses test-based and Bates–Granger weighting. For a realistic simulation design, we generate multivariate time series samples from a macroeconomic DSGE-VAR (dynamic stochastic general equilibrium–vector autoregressive) model. Results generally support Bates–Granger over uniform weighting, whereas benefits of test-based weights depend on the sample size and on the prediction horizon. In a corresponding application to real-world data, simple averaging performs best. Uniform averages may be the weighting scheme that is most robust to empirically observed irregularities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 305–324 |
| Journal | Journal of Forecasting |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | May 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2017 |
Keywords
- forecasting
- combining forecasts
- encompassing tests
- model selection
- time series