The Use and Valuation of Journals in Planning Scholarship: Peer Assessment versus Impact Factors

Harvey Goldstein, Gunther Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

A Web-based survey of faculty at all ACSP schools is used to assess the value peers place on various journals. The results of the survey show that two journals—the Journal of the American Planning Association and the Journal of Planning Education and Research—dominate all others in importance. The authors analyze the survey data to identify how the relative valuation of journals differs by individual faculty or institutional characteristics. The authors then test whether the journals’ importance by peer judgment is related to journal impact factors. The results demonstrate clearly there is no correlation between the two.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-75
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Planning Education and Research
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jul 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

Keywords

  • planning journals
  • journal impact factors
  • planning scholarship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Use and Valuation of Journals in Planning Scholarship: Peer Assessment versus Impact Factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this